Nominator's statement

Paper is at: http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/abs/phil/199807022

comments

• This is an important work and should we included on this list.

• The discussion it provoked may have been important, but I don't think that this paper deserves any credit because of this. The thesis expounded in it is generally accepted as being at least naive (more likely wrong), but more importantly, there is almost no argument made in this paper in support of its iffy thesis. Perhaps a chapter of a book that explains the issue would be a more valuable inclusion.