Home Top 100 Nominations Comment form

Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment?
Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955)
Psychological Review, 62, 32-41


Nominator's statement

Traditionally, the problem of perceptual learning has been "how much is learned?" Sharing the assumption that we must go beyond the information given to the senses, nativists and empiricists have argued whether the enrichment we provide for meage r sensory inputs is primarily innate or acquired and hence, whether much or only a little of perception is learned. Eleanor and James Gibson argued against both types of enrichment theories, proposing a radically different specificity or differentiation theory according to which the information available for perception is indefinitely rich and detailed. Thus, perceptual learning involves processes of differentiating variables of stimulation rather than of adding meanings to impoverished stimulus input. This was a completely new conception of perceptual learning that opened up novel and fruitful areas for study. Eleanor Gibson is largely responsible for the development of the field of perceptual learning.

Nominations have closed, but you can still add a comment to this nomination.

Write your comment here:

Your Name
(optional)
Your name will not be listed with your comment, but check here if we may acknowledge you in a separate list of contributors
e-mail
(optional)
Check here if you would like to be included in the Millennium Project mailing list.

Home Top 100 Nominations Comment form

If you find an obvious error please send mail to The Millenium Master.
Send millennium-project related comments to The Millenium Master.
Send web-related comments to The Webmaster.

©2000 Center for Cognitive Sciences, University of Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
This page was last modified on Sun Aug 27 20:19:02 2000.